Build in public · 9 July 2026
We took our own medicine: scoring our own site 60 out of 100
We ran the Non-Commodity Score and the 330-check audit on laurelinlabs.com, published the whole thing, and turned the findings into the rulebook every new page now has to pass.
It is easy to sell a standard. It is harder to live by it in public. So we did the obvious thing and pointed our own tools at our own site. The Non-Commodity Score, which grades a page on how far it sits from generic content, gave laurelinlabs.com a 60 out of 100. We published the entire report, page by page, with the working shown.
The honest read is that we win our own name and our own tools, but we do not yet win the big category terms. That is a fair verdict and a useful one. It named the gap, and the gap became a plan.
The audit also changed how the site is built. Two things shipped off the back of it. First, the whole site moved to a topic-first architecture anchored to the Four Pillars, so every page has one obvious home and the structure itself demonstrates the method. Second, and more importantly, the findings became a rulebook: every new page, tool or article now has to clear four gates before it goes live. It has to map to one topic pillar, clear the Non-Commodity Score, satisfy the relevant checks in the 330-check AEO audit, and carry correct metadata and structured data. We follow our own rulebook first.
The Trust Signals pillar is the one that had no content when we started. This is the first piece in it, which is exactly how a topic-first structure is supposed to work: it shows you the gap, then you fill it.
See it for yourself
Read the full interactive report, or run the same score on any page of your own.
The field notes
Frameworks, builds and what is changing in AI search.
Sent occasionally, never noise. The thinking behind the work, and the experiments before they ship.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.