Entity Authority is how clearly Google can identify who an author or organisation is, and how consistently that identity is corroborated across the surfaces it trusts. It is not authority itself, it is authority’s resolvability. The work is to make real, earned authority legible to the knowledge graph, never to manufacture it.
Layer 2: how do you corroborate the entity across trusted nodes?
Once the home base exists, build the corroborating references Google cross-checks: a Wikidata item where notability genuinely supports it, LinkedIn as a consistent entity node, accurate industry-registry listings, earned guest contributions and podcast or panel appearances. Everything here must be earned and real, the value is in genuine corroboration, never volume.
What do the numbers say about schema markup and entity authority?
| Metric | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Facts in the Google Knowledge Graph | 1.6 trillion | Wikipedia |
| Entities in the Google Knowledge Graph | 54 billion | Wikipedia |
| Rich result types Google supports via structured data | 35+ | Google for Developers |
Figures as reported by the cited sources on the dates they published them.
Frequently asked questions about schema markup and entity authority
What is entity SEO?
Optimising a brand, product or person as a distinct, verifiable entity in the knowledge graphs that search engines and AI models use: consistent Organization and Person structured data, resolvable sameAs identifiers such as Wikidata, ORCID and LinkedIn, and third-party mentions that corroborate the same facts. It is authority made legible to machines, not authority manufactured.
Do you need a Wikidata item to have entity authority?
Not always, but it helps because Wikidata is a node most knowledge graphs already trust. Where the notability rules allow an item, create one with real references; where they do not, ORCID, Companies House, LinkedIn and consistent schema do most of the work.